Story

Kim Kardashian Has Fans Speculating About Who She Voted For

Kanye West might be the only person in the West-Kardashian household that believes he’s fit to lead America. https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/kim-kardashian-has-fans-speculating-about-who-she-voted-for-news.120733.html…

Kim Kardashian has been working closely with the Trump administration in the past few years for criminal justice reform but she never clarified if that’s who she was voting for. In fact, even with her husband running for president, she still remained silent on her political stance.

Roy Rochlin/Getty Images

Kim was among the celebrities to reveal that they did cast their ballot. While plenty of her peers, and her husband, revealed who they casted their ballot for, Kim still remained quiet about her endorsement. Was it Trump? The first president that has allowed her into the White House. Or Kanye? Someone that she shares four children with.

Social media sleuths may have found out that it was neither. Two interactions on Kim Kardashian’s Twitter account suggest that she may have shown her support to the Biden/Harris campaign. The first tweet was one of Kid Cudi who wrote, “Vote for Biden if you a real one.” The second was a retweet of Kamala Harris’ message on going out to vote. Perhaps, Kim simply agreed with the message of carrying out one’s civil duties to cast their vote and make their voices heard. Plus, Kim’s remained awfully quiet about Kanye’s presidential push, though she did remain in support of her husband following his dreams.

Despite what people perceived on Twitter, Instagram speculated that Kim went all the way red. There wasn’t much to back up this claim aside from the fact that Kim Kardashian shared a photo after she cast her vote rocking a red dress. It didn’t help that Kim later took down the photo to re-post it in black-and-white.

She hasn’t confirmed her support for the Democratic party, Republican party, or the Birthday Party but we hope that she continues her criminal justice reform efforts regardless of who wins the election.

Tweet LinkedIn PinShares0

Story

DJ Akademiks questions if Lil Durk will get bond as the racketeering case goes on

Lil Durk’s legal battle is about to take another big step, and DJ Akademiks is already sharing his expectations for what could go down when the rapper returns to court in November.

Durk is in custody, awaiting his next VICAR case in which authorities say he was running a criminal enterprise. His next trial was set for October 5, but recent developments have called into question when those proceedings will occur.

Durk’s murder for hire trial recently resulted in a not guilty verdict in November. Regardless of that outcome, he remains in custody because the separate racketeering related charges remain unresolved. Durk’s attorneys have asked for the new hearing and have been ordered to appear by U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services, which also must submit a fresh bail report.

Against that backdrop, legal commentator Bradford Cohen had previously suggested Durk could eventually get bond. That view ties in with Durk’s not-guilty verdict in the earlier case, and the argument that the outcome could make it harder to sustain the remaining allegations.

DJ Akademiks sees things a bit differently. In a recent livestream, Akademiks predicted that Durk would not get a bond at the Nov. hearing. He believes the charges will stick and cites the seriousness of the allegations in the VICAR case as his reasoning. He also doesn’t appear to expect the rapper to be released from jail anytime soon as the case moves forward.

Akademiks’ prediction concerns the bond hearing, not Durk’s chances at trial. Durk’s legal situation remains unresolved for now. His recent acquittal has altered the circumstances of his arrest, but the separate racketeering case still looms over the rapper as both sides prepare for the next phase.

Tweet LinkedIn PinShares0

Celebrity

DJ Akademiks Resurrects 2015 Drake vs. Meek Mill Beef With Alleged Nicki Minaj Backstory

DJ Akademiks is digging up hip-hop history buried for 10 years as he offers his supposed explanation for how the Drake/Meek Mill feud came to a head in 2015. The back-and-forth between Akademiks and Meek Mill has resurfaced the conversation. Akademiks returned to the long-running Drake-Meek beef on his stream last night, saying a comment by Nicki Minaj had something to do with what happened between the two rappers.

According to Akademiks, Meek and Minaj were shopping at a designer fashion store when they got to the register. He says that when Meek told her he didn’t have the cash to pay for Minaj, she allegedly told him he would never be Drake. Akademiks also claims Minaj left the store on her own, and then Meek went on X, and what happened next started the infamous feud with Drake.

The account remains an allegation, not a confirmed explanation. The information provided has not been independently verified, and ultimately only those involved, including Minaj and Meek Mill, could confirm the story’s authenticity.

The beef between Drake and Meek Mill started in 2015 and has become a staple in hip-hop conversation. Meek struggled after the fallout, while the beef became a defining moment in Drake’s career. However, the two eventually made up and collaborated on “Going Bad,” signaling a return to a more cooperative relationship despite the rivalry’s tension.

Now that Akademiks and Meek are throwing shots again, the events of 2015 are back in the conversation. By reflecting on the feud, Akademiks has added another possible piece of context to a story that has been a hot topic in hip-hop for years.

Whether his version of events is what actually happened, however, remains unresolved. Currently, the designer-store story isn’t factual, but it is Akademiks’ version of the events surrounding the beef.

Tweet LinkedIn PinShares0